I've been looking at 762. It does look a bit hairy, dealing with all the protection levels of the classes. Did you come up with an approach you were happy with?
-----Original Message----- From: Grant Ingersoll [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 3:57 AM To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Lucene 2.1, soon -1 I would like a few more days to get https://issues.apache.org/jira/ browse/LUCENE-762, as it may involve moving some classes and I don't want to do that after an official release. It is not a major issue, but I do think it is important to get right before the release. Sorry for the delay. Thanks, Grant On Feb 1, 2007, at 6:02 AM, Michael McCandless wrote: > Michael Busch wrote: >> Michael McCandless wrote: >>> >>> >>> I plan on committing this one today. Once that's in I think we can >>> and should get the release process going (Yonik had graciously >>> volunteered to be the release manager)? >>> >> +1 for starting the release process. Especially the big new >> features "lazy field loading", "lockless commits" and "delete in >> IndexWriter" should make it a valuable upgrade for a lot of users. >> Additionally, there have been various patches that improve >> performance or prevent index corruption. > > OK I just committed LUCENE-565 so I think we can get 2.1 started now? > > Mike > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -------------------------- Grant Ingersoll Center for Natural Language Processing http://www.cnlp.org Read the Lucene Java FAQ at http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-lucene/ LuceneFAQ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
