Hi Daniel, thanks a lot. I see part of the email was more for the users list. However, assuming this is not what I want (I do not want to be able to reconstruct a document or a good approximation of it), would it be very disruptive for Lucene architecture avoid to store the positions? Would it be a change that would touch the core of the library or the indexing engine?
I will do my investigation in the code, but maybe the experts here have already a piece of the answer. Thanks agains. Stefano On 5/17/07, Daniel Naber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thursday 17 May 2007 00:58, Stefano Fornari wrote: > I have a question to which I could not answer reading the > documentation and searching the mailing list archive: This actually belongs more to the user list... try Luke and click on the "Reconstruct & Edit" button, then on the "Tokenized" tab. This will show you what can be recreated. This depends on the stopwords and the other normalizations made by the Analyzer. Regards Daniel -- http://www.danielnaber.de --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Stefano Fornari - Funambol Chief Architect / Funambol CTO ======================================================= Home: http://www.funambol.org Documents: http://www.funambol.org/documentation/documents.html FAQ: http://www.funambol.org/support/faq.html WIKI: https://wiki.objectweb.org/sync4j/ Mailinglist archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sync4j (login required) http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=215 (sync4j-users) http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=48877 (funambol-dev) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
