Thanks a lot. Sorry for the wrong list usage. Stefano
On 5/17/07, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: thanks a lot. I see part of the email was more for the users list. : However, assuming this is not what I want (I do not want to be able to : reconstruct a document or a good approximation of it), would it be : very disruptive for Lucene architecture avoid to store the positions? : Would it be a change that would touch the core of the library or the : indexing engine? see this thread, starting with this particular message... http://www.nabble.com/Index-a-source%2C-but-not-store-it...-can-it-be-done--tf3369910.html#a9387997 And for the record: the dev list is more geared for questions/discussions about changing/improving the APIs/internals once you already have a specific idea in mind about changing hte internals ... if the nature of your question is: "is this possible" or "what would it take to make this possible" you should start with the user list. -Hoss --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Stefano Fornari - Funambol Chief Architect / Funambol CTO ======================================================= Home: http://www.funambol.org Documents: http://www.funambol.org/documentation/documents.html FAQ: http://www.funambol.org/support/faq.html WIKI: https://wiki.objectweb.org/sync4j/ Mailinglist archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sync4j (login required) http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=215 (sync4j-users) http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=48877 (funambol-dev) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
