On Thursday 31 May 2007 05:52, Erik Hatcher wrote: > > On May 30, 2007, at 9:33 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: > >> I'd rather see each jar get its own javadoc, > >> or at the very least, indicate which jar each > >> class is defined in for the ones that aren't > >> part of the core. > >> > > > > Yeah, I don't like that all the contribs are built in together. > > What do others think? I would vote for separating them out. > > I concur with having the contrib docs separated. I may have been the > one (or at least assisted with it) who got the documentation build to > fold it altogether as that was the goal at the time. It'd be much > easier, build-wise, if all artifacts were kept entirely separate for > all the various contrib libraries and the core, as well as the demo.
Currently it is not clear in the javadocs whether a class belongs to core or contrib. Having separate javadocs would probably improve that. I have no experience in linking between javadoc "packages", so I have no suggestion on how to make such a separation. Regards, Paul Elschot --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
