+1 on moving to JDK 1.5 I'm also psyched for more frequent releases! But in this case I would like to get both the Analyzer optimizations (re-using tokens) and LUCENE-845 in before 2.3 if I can. 2 months should be a good time frame for that.
Mike "Grant Ingersoll" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jul 26, 2007, at 8:56 PM, Michael Busch wrote: > > > Grant Ingersoll wrote: > >> 2. Release 2.4 so all of Mike M's goodness is available to 1.4 users > >> within the next 2-4 weeks using our new release mechanism (i.e code > > > > > > Hi Grant, > > > > 2-4 weeks seems quite soon considering that 2.2 is very new and that > > there are a lot of open issues targeted for 2.3. For example, I would > > like to get LUCENE-743 into the next release. And Mike is also working > > on a couple of issues, like LUCENE-845, that, I think, should be > > committed before the next release. > > > > OK, that is fine with me, I guess I was just hyped up to get going. > Also, we did say we wanted to release more often, but you are right, > we did just do 2.3. > > >> > >> Here is my +1. > >> > > > > My +1 for switching to JDK 1.5 with Lucene 3.0, however in a somewhat > > relaxed timeframe. Releasing 2.3 in let's say 2 months seems more > > realistic and reasonable to me. > > > > So, +1 for ~2 mos. time frame. > > > Btw: I could also do the RM work again if you want me to, I'm in > > practice now ;) (oh that reminds me that I should update the wiki > > release page... will do) > > Cool, I would like to have try my hand at it at least once just so we > have another person on it, but will gladly work with you on it. > > -Grant > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
