On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 9:21 PM, DM Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Grant Ingersoll wrote: > > We voted to make 3.0 Java 1.5, full well knowing that it will break > > the back compat. requirements. I don't see the point of postponing it > > or dragging it out. > > I thought his suggestion was to skip 3.0 as a designator and instead use > 4.0. If so, the schedule would not change. >
Right, that's what I meant: * 2.9 with deprecations, * 3.0 removing deprecated stuff but still Java 1.4, * 4.0 first Java 5 version But I am catching up now a looong list of discussions and missed this vote, so I am ok with taking this back and proceed as voted. - Doron
