All it takes is one line in the announcement saying "Version 3.0 uses
Java 1.5" I don't think the significance will be lost on anyone.
Everyone knows what Java 1.5 is. I'm -1 on calling it 4.0. People
will then ask where is 3.0. I am +1 for sticking w/ the plan we voted
for as described on http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/Java_1%2e5_Migration
(last edited 10/1/2007) It's not like we are springing this on
anyone. In fact, I'd be more than happy to announce it on the user
list to let people know ahead of time.
On Mar 10, 2008, at 3:52 PM, Doron Cohen wrote:
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 9:21 PM, DM Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Grant Ingersoll wrote:
We voted to make 3.0 Java 1.5, full well knowing that it will break
the back compat. requirements. I don't see the point of
postponing it
or dragging it out.
I thought his suggestion was to skip 3.0 as a designator and
instead use
4.0. If so, the schedule would not change.
Right, that's what I meant:
* 2.9 with deprecations,
* 3.0 removing deprecated stuff but still Java 1.4,
* 4.0 first Java 5 version
But I am catching up now a looong list of discussions and missed
this vote, so I am ok with taking this back and proceed as voted.
- Doron
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
