[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1436?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12711783#action_12711783
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1436:
------------------------------------
I just hope this does not collide with LUCENE-1614. Note that in the follow-up
issue to 1614 (the number is yet to be generated) I intend to change the logic
in ReqExclScorer so that it conforms to the new semantics of DISI.
Why do we need to make this class package-private? Any particular reason
besides not needing to worry about changes to back-compat in the future?
> Make ReqExclScorer package private, and use DocIdSetIterator for excluded
> part.
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-1436
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1436
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Search
> Reporter: Paul Elschot
> Priority: Trivial
> Attachments: LUCENE-1436.patch
>
>
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
