[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1436?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12711790#action_12711790
]
Paul Elschot commented on LUCENE-1436:
--------------------------------------
This should only affect external code that uses the ReqExclScorer class.
>From the amount of reactions on that so far I think such code probably does
>not exist.
The move to DocIdSetIterator (superclass of Scorer) can be done because no
score values are used on the excluded part. This is only a consequence of the
extraction of the DocIdSetIterator superclass from Scorer.
So I don't expect LUCENE-1614 or new semantics of DISI to collide with this.
Also, I don't expect LUCENE-1614 to collide with LUCENE-1345 that allows filter
as clause to boolean query.
Some time ago DisjunctionSumScorer was made private in a similar way.
ReqOptSumScorer could also be made package private, perhaps even at the same
time as ReqExclScorer.
> Make ReqExclScorer package private, and use DocIdSetIterator for excluded
> part.
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-1436
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1436
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Search
> Reporter: Paul Elschot
> Priority: Trivial
> Attachments: LUCENE-1436.patch
>
>
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
