[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1614?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12713931#action_12713931
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1614:
--------------------------------------------
{quote}
After I made add() private, created a ScorerClauseWrapper (in BQ) and passed to
BS2 a list of SCW (to pass in one call Scorer, req, prohib), I couldn't still
call initCountingSumScorer in the ctor. Then it reminded me that we've had this
discussion before - it's related to being able to ask for topScorer() or not.
Reason is, if I call initCount...() in the ctor, it advances the sub scorers.
If the scorer is then used as a topScorer, they may be advanced again, if BS is
used.
So I thought, let's not call nextDoc() in BS's ctor, but that leads to other
problems, since the scorers passed may have called nextDoc() themselves
(DisjunctionSumScorer) or may not (ReqExclScorer).
The decision back then was to leave it as-is, and handle it in LUCENE-1630,
when we'll be able to ask for topScorer. What do you think?
{quote}
Sigh. I wonder if you could record that next had been called, in the
ScorerClauseWrapper, and then BS wouldn't re-do the next in its ctor? That
added if would only be in the ctor.
But, yeah I agree: let's wind down this issue and push this (and other)
optimizations into LUCENE-1652.
bq. I noticed I accidentally changed the signature of setFreqCurrentDoc, which
is protected. So I reverted the change and added JustCompileSpanScorer which
overrides that method, so we'll discover that safely in the future (test-tag
still passes).
Woops, OK good.
I'll have a look through the current patch. I think we are close!
> Add next() and skipTo() variants to DocIdSetIterator that return the current
> doc, instead of boolean
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-1614
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1614
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Search
> Reporter: Shai Erera
> Fix For: 2.9
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-1614.patch, LUCENE-1614.patch, LUCENE-1614.patch,
> LUCENE-1614.patch, LUCENE-1614.patch, LUCENE-1614.patch, LUCENE-1614.patch
>
>
> See
> http://www.nabble.com/Another-possible-optimization---now-in-DocIdSetIterator-p23223319.html
> for the full discussion. The basic idea is to add variants to those two
> methods that return the current doc they are at, to save successive calls to
> doc(). If there are no more docs, return -1. A summary of what was discussed
> so far:
> # Deprecate those two methods.
> # Add nextDoc() and skipToDoc(int) that return doc, with default impl in DISI
> (calls next() and skipTo() respectively, and will be changed to abstract in
> 3.0).
> #* I actually would like to propose an alternative to the names: advance()
> and advance(int) - the first advances by one, the second advances to target.
> # Wherever these are used, do something like '(doc = advance()) >= 0' instead
> of comparing to -1 for improved performance.
> I will post a patch shortly
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
