Well, it's unassigned and has no comments so my guess is: it's all yours!

This would be a great step forward.  The line between Solr & Lucene
ought to be more "crisp" and this issue is a step towards that...

Mike

On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Simon
Willnauer<simon.willna...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hey there,
>
> I'm curious if anybody is working on the issue
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1085
> and the blocker https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1085 ?
> I would love to see both solr and lucene using the same api for search
> functions.
> The issues have been idle for a while so I would take over and try to
> make it happen in 3.0.
>
> simon
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to