yes it is. just needs a volunteer to help me commit the patch. On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 6:15 AM, Yonik Seeley <yo...@lucidimagination.com>wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:53 PM, Shai Erera<ser...@gmail.com> wrote: > > But note that Query has weight() and createWeight(), which I am still > > confused about why we have two of them. Maybe I can consolidate them to > one? > > createWeight() raw weight, and weight() is a top-level normalized weight. > I don't think they should be consolidated, but good JavaDoc is needed. > > But the fact that "weight" is also a non-static public member is > further evidence that createWeight() needs to be public (how else > would one provide a different implementation?) > > > Anyway, I think this better be handled as part of LUCENE-1630, since the > > Query and Weight classes are touched already in that are exactly. > > If it's going to make it into 2.9, that's fine. > > -Yonik > http://www.lucidimagination.com > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > >
