I would love to see function queries consolidated between Solr and Lucene! I think it's a prime example of duplicated and then diverged sources between Lucene and Solr...
And it's fabulous that you are "volunteering", Simon ;) We have precious few volunteers that stride both communities well enough, and have the itch, to do this. So I'd love to see progress made towards this.... but I also think it's a little too big to hold up 2.9 for. The back compat requirement is certainly important, but I would assume workable, ie it should not hold up this consolidation... Mike On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 4:27 AM, Simon Willnauer<simon.willna...@googlemail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 11:47 PM, Yonik > Seeley<yo...@lucidimagination.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 5:38 PM, Simon >> Willnauer<simon.willna...@googlemail.com> wrote: >>> I was thinking of adding a patch for >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1085 >> >> That's *way* too big of an issue and it breaks back compat in Solr (to >> change from Solr's to Lucene's version - I know many people who have >> implemented and plugged in their own functions.) > Do you have a pointer to back compat policy in solr or is it the same > as in Lucene?! > > simon >> >> -Yonik >> http://www.lucidimagination.com >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
