[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1695?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12736113#action_12736113
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1695:
---------------------------------------
bq. I think you could probably continue using the 2.4 Highlighter jar as well?
All of the classes should be intact and compatible I think.
Should be (from the TokenStream changes perspective). Are there any non-bw
changes in query processing that may affect highlighter?
> Update the Highlighter to use the new TokenStream API
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-1695
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1695
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: contrib/highlighter
> Reporter: Mark Miller
> Assignee: Mark Miller
> Fix For: 2.9
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-1695.patch, LUCENE-1695.patch, LUCENE-1695.patch,
> LUCENE-1695.patch
>
>
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
