On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Yonik Seeley<yo...@lucidimagination.com> wrote: > OK, it sounds like it should always be the same as SortField.getReversed() > then? > In which case it seems redundant to pass it into > SortField.getComparator() since SortField already keeps track of it?
Duh, right. I'll remove as an arg and simply use SortField's reverse attr directly. In fact I think SortField.getComparator should be package private? I'll fold this into LUCENE-1779. Mike --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
