We didn't spend much effort speeding up indexing, I think? Was OS's IO cache warm for both of your tests?
Was the resulting index size approximately the same? Mike On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 4:00 PM, Mark Miller<markrmil...@gmail.com> wrote: > Has anything changed in benchmark that would make things uncomparable > between 2.9 and 2.4? > > I don't see anything in Changes that should have that much of an affect ... > > I tried micro bench on each and 2.9 ran twice as fast. > > I also tried standard. Which is a crazy difference. Particularly, with > indexing I think. Its too big of a dif to make sense ... > > Any thoughts? > > -- > - Mark > > http://www.lucidimagination.com > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
