Hmmm ... its not less RAM - its 140 for both.
I'll share my results when its done, and double check that I'm not
missing anything - but its two fresh checkouts and identical conditions
that I can see.
2.9 took a little over 3 minutes. 2.4 took - well, I'll tell you when
its done, but its already been over 20 ...
???
Shai Erera wrote:
Well .. the latest additions reuse a Document instance and Fields by
default. Don't think it should make that much of a difference though.
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 11:00 PM, Mark Miller <markrmil...@gmail.com
<mailto:markrmil...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Has anything changed in benchmark that would make things
uncomparable between 2.9 and 2.4?
I don't see anything in Changes that should have that much of an
affect ...
I tried micro bench on each and 2.9 ran twice as fast.
I also tried standard. Which is a crazy difference. Particularly,
with indexing I think. Its too big of a dif to make sense ...
Any thoughts?
--
- Mark
http://www.lucidimagination.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
<mailto:java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
<mailto:java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org>
--
- Mark
http://www.lucidimagination.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
