On 8/11/09 4:13 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
On Aug 11, 2009, at 4:28 AM, Michael Busch wrote:
I'm not just responding to just you there, but more to the growing
pack of those speaking against the new API. I don't see specific
issues being brought up - the only issues I have seen brought up
have been addressed in JIRA issues that have received no comments
indicating the fix was not good enough. So we are seeing a lot of
general complaints, but specific complaints have been addressed as
far as I can tell.
Thanks Mark. Yeah, I'm really not sure what actually the problem here
is now. There was a performance test in Solr that apparently ran much
slower after upgrading to the new Lucene jar. This test is testing a
rather uncommon scenario: very very short documents.
That is not an uncommon scenario. Solr has very, very short fields
_ALL THE TIME_.
I meant that having documents that only contain very short fields is not
as common as having docs with a decent amount of text. Maybe I'm wrong
- in either case I didn't try to say it's not an important use case. I
think it is important to have good performance here too. The point I
was trying to make was that we tested performance more thoroughly for
the case we thought would be more common.
According to the numbers posted on LUCENE-1796 it now seems like it's
fixed - even for documents with only very short fields and no reusable
TokenStreams.
Michael
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
