[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1791?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12742598#action_12742598
 ] 

Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1791:
-------------------------------------

{quote}I don't think the fieldcache insanity is multi-reader related - it looks 
to me like some entries have a parser, and some null for the parser, even 
though the default parser is being used in both cases. The FieldSource types 
grab a FieldCache and may pass null as the parser, which ends up putting null 
in the cache entry - but if you specifically ask for the default parser, that 
puts the default parser in the fieldcache entry - same stuff now, doubled 
entry.{quote}

Well that explains half the output anyway - even if thats fixed there is still 
a fail. Its because the tests doesn't expand fully into the subreaders - just 
needed the top level before - with this test, we need to recursively grab them.


> Enhance QueryUtils and CheckHIts to wrap everything they check in 
> MultiReader/MultiSearcher
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-1791
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1791
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Test
>            Reporter: Hoss Man
>             Fix For: 2.9
>
>         Attachments: LUCENE-1791.patch
>
>
> methods in CheckHits & QueryUtils are in a good position to take any Searcher 
> they are given and not only test it, but also test MultiReader & 
> MultiSearcher constructs built around them

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to