[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1791?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12742598#action_12742598 ]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1791: ------------------------------------- {quote}I don't think the fieldcache insanity is multi-reader related - it looks to me like some entries have a parser, and some null for the parser, even though the default parser is being used in both cases. The FieldSource types grab a FieldCache and may pass null as the parser, which ends up putting null in the cache entry - but if you specifically ask for the default parser, that puts the default parser in the fieldcache entry - same stuff now, doubled entry.{quote} Well that explains half the output anyway - even if thats fixed there is still a fail. Its because the tests doesn't expand fully into the subreaders - just needed the top level before - with this test, we need to recursively grab them. > Enhance QueryUtils and CheckHIts to wrap everything they check in > MultiReader/MultiSearcher > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: LUCENE-1791 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1791 > Project: Lucene - Java > Issue Type: Test > Reporter: Hoss Man > Fix For: 2.9 > > Attachments: LUCENE-1791.patch > > > methods in CheckHits & QueryUtils are in a good position to take any Searcher > they are given and not only test it, but also test MultiReader & > MultiSearcher constructs built around them -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org