[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1791?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12742758#action_12742758
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-1791:
-----------------------------------------
I just looked at the patch - one little minor thing. Would it make sense to
randomized reader / searcher indexes in wrapUnderlyingReader / wrapSearchers
to catch possible array index related issues? This could also be done for the
num of deleted terms and types of searcher / readers.
simon
> Enhance QueryUtils and CheckHIts to wrap everything they check in
> MultiReader/MultiSearcher
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-1791
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1791
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Test
> Reporter: Hoss Man
> Fix For: 2.9
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-1791.patch, LUCENE-1791.patch, LUCENE-1791.patch,
> LUCENE-1791.patch
>
>
> methods in CheckHits & QueryUtils are in a good position to take any Searcher
> they are given and not only test it, but also test MultiReader &
> MultiSearcher constructs built around them
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
