[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1808?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12743427#action_12743427
 ] 

Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1808:
------------------------------------

bq. when you made createQueryWeight, you made it public

Found it - 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1630?focusedCommentId=12719992&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#action_12719992
 - I originally created it protected, only later made it public, following 
Yonik's proposal from here - 
http://osdir.com/ml/java-dev.lucene.apache.org/2009-06/msg00803.html.

bq. things are always changing, and new info / tradeoffs always come up.

Of course, that was just a comment. :)

> make Query.createWeight public (or add back Query.createQueryWeight())
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-1808
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1808
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Query/Scoring
>    Affects Versions: 2.9
>            Reporter: Tim Smith
>
> Now that the QueryWeight class has been removed, the public QueryWeight 
> createQueryWeight() method on Query was also removed
> i have cases where i want to create a weight for a sub query (outside of the 
> org.apache.lucene.search package) and i don't want the weight normalized 
> (think BooleanQuery outside of the o.a.l.search package)
> in order to do this, i have to create a static Utils class inside 
> o.a.l.search, pass in the Query and searcher, and have the static method call 
> the protected createWeight method
> this should not be necessary
> This could be fixed in one of 2 ways:
> 1. make createWeight() public on Query (breaks back compat)
> 2. add the following method:
> {code}
> public Weight createQueryWeight(Searcher searcher) throws IOException {
>   return createWeight(searcher);
> }
> {code}
> createWeight(Searcher) should then be deprectated in favor of the publicly 
> accessible method

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to