[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1849?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12747206#action_12747206
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1849:
------------------------------------
bq. I think we should simply do nothing
+1. So many use cases brought up in this issue, and so many "helper" classes. I
just can't help imagining the future of this "I want a non scoring collector,
which accepts docs out of order, and keeps its next reader ..." and we'll try
very hard to create a helper class which does that because now we cannot
inherit from two 'abstract' Collectors, each achieving part of it.
I also feel that when I'll upgrade all of HitCollectors to Collector, the
decision on what to do where will not be that difficult - it's pretty
straightforward I think. At least it's the same decision as "which collector
should I subclass" ...
> Add OutOfOrderCollector and InOrderCollector subclasses of Collector
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-1849
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1849
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Wish
> Components: Search
> Affects Versions: 2.9
> Reporter: Tim Smith
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 2.9
>
>
> I find myself always having to implement these methods, and i always return a
> constant (depending on if the collector can handle out of order hits)
> would be nice for these two convenience abstract classes to exist that
> implemented acceptsDocsOutOfOrder() as final and returned the appropriate
> value
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
