The term format did not change since the major revision with Yonik at the begin of year. Only the API and term generation was changed (NumericField, NumericTokenStream).
If you use the same precStep it should work. ----- Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > -----Original Message----- > From: Shon Vella [mailto:sve...@technologist.com] > Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 4:27 PM > To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Numeric Field index compatibility > > I have some indexes that were created using a dev version of 2.9 from > early June, when the Numeric field stuff was moved to lucene core from > the query contrib package. Now that 2.9 is becoming available, I need to > migrate to using the stuff in core and was wondering about the index > level compatibility between the two. In other words, can I use the stuff > in core against an index that was created using the contrib stuff? > > -Shon > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
