Thanks, Uwe. I suspected as much, but wanted to make sure. -Shon
Uwe Schindler wrote: > The term format did not change since the major revision with Yonik at the > begin of year. Only the API and term generation was changed (NumericField, > NumericTokenStream). > > If you use the same precStep it should work. > > ----- > Uwe Schindler > H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen > http://www.thetaphi.de > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Shon Vella [mailto:sve...@technologist.com] >> Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 4:27 PM >> To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org >> Subject: Numeric Field index compatibility >> >> I have some indexes that were created using a dev version of 2.9 from >> early June, when the Numeric field stuff was moved to lucene core from >> the query contrib package. Now that 2.9 is becoming available, I need to >> migrate to using the stuff in core and was wondering about the index >> level compatibility between the two. In other words, can I use the stuff >> in core against an index that was created using the contrib stuff? >> >> -Shon >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
