Should we fix these kind of things in the 2.9 branch too?
I'm 99.9% sure we'll have a 2.9.1 release - 3.0 will be a bunch of work
for users to upgrade, so we should definitely deliver a bugfix release
for 2.9, even if we (hopefully) only find minor bugs.
Michael
On 10/4/09 12:14 AM, markrmil...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markrmiller
Date: Sat Oct 3 22:14:18 2009
New Revision: 821434
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=821434&view=rev
Log:
don't point to deprecated method
Modified:
lucene/java/trunk/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/Searcher.java
Modified: lucene/java/trunk/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/Searcher.java
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/lucene/java/trunk/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/Searcher.java?rev=821434&r1=821433&r2=821434&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- lucene/java/trunk/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/Searcher.java (original)
+++ lucene/java/trunk/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/Searcher.java Sat Oct
3 22:14:18 2009
@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@
*
*<p>Applications should only use this if they need<i>all</i> of the
* matching documents. The high-level search API ({...@link
- * Searcher#search(Query)}) is usually more efficient, as it skips
+ * Searcher#search(Query, int)}) is usually more efficient, as it skips
* non-high-scoring hits.
*<p>Note: The<code>score</code> passed to this method is a raw score.
* In other words, the score will not necessarily be a float whose value is
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
