No bug fixes for the lazy!
:)
We should also fix Hits then - how about something like:
* @deprecated
* see {...@link Searcher#search(Query, int)} and {...@link
Searcher#search(Query, Sort)}
* as well as the variants that take a {...@link Filter} :<br>
* <pre>
* TopDocs topDocs = searcher.search(query, numHits);
* ScoreDoc[] hits = topDocs.scoreDocs;
* for (int i = 0; i < hits.length; i++) {
* int docId = hits[i].doc;
* Document d = searcher.doc(docId);
* // do something with current hit
* ...
* </pre>
*/
Michael Busch wrote:
> On 10/4/09 12:42 AM, Mark Miller wrote:
>> Why will 3.0 be work to upgrade? 2.9 was supposed to be the work, 3.0 no
>> work ...
>>
>
> With 2.9 you can be lazy and live with deprecation warnings. With 3.0
> you *have* to switch to undeprecated APIs.
>
> Michael
>
>> In either case, I don't mind a 2.9.1 - but it hadn't been planned yet
>> that I saw.
>>
>> Michael Busch wrote:
>>
>>> Should we fix these kind of things in the 2.9 branch too?
>>> I'm 99.9% sure we'll have a 2.9.1 release - 3.0 will be a bunch of
>>> work for users to upgrade, so we should definitely deliver a bugfix
>>> release for 2.9, even if we (hopefully) only find minor bugs.
>>>
>>> Michael
>>>
>>> On 10/4/09 12:14 AM, markrmil...@apache.org wrote:
>>>
>>>> Author: markrmiller
>>>> Date: Sat Oct 3 22:14:18 2009
>>>> New Revision: 821434
>>>>
>>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=821434&view=rev
>>>> Log:
>>>> don't point to deprecated method
>>>>
>>>> Modified:
>>>>
>>>> lucene/java/trunk/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/Searcher.java
>>>>
>>>> Modified:
>>>> lucene/java/trunk/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/Searcher.java
>>>> URL:
>>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/lucene/java/trunk/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/Searcher.java?rev=821434&r1=821433&r2=821434&view=diff
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ==============================================================================
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --- lucene/java/trunk/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/Searcher.java
>>>> (original)
>>>> +++ lucene/java/trunk/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/Searcher.java
>>>> Sat Oct 3 22:14:18 2009
>>>> @@ -118,7 +118,7 @@
>>>> *
>>>> *<p>Applications should only use this if they need<i>all</i>
>>>> of the
>>>> * matching documents. The high-level search API ({...@link
>>>> - * Searcher#search(Query)}) is usually more efficient, as it skips
>>>> + * Searcher#search(Query, int)}) is usually more efficient, as it
>>>> skips
>>>> * non-high-scoring hits.
>>>> *<p>Note: The<code>score</code> passed to this method is a raw
>>>> score.
>>>> * In other words, the score will not necessarily be a float whose
>>>> value is
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
--
- Mark
http://www.lucidimagination.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
