[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1946?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12764467#action_12764467
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1946:
-------------------------------------
{quote}
There is one question: I removed IsoLatin1Filter. Thismay be a backwards break,
so that old indexes using this filter in the analyzer need to be reindexed. But
for most cases the AccentFilter would also work, but some hits may be missing
when you query such an index. What should we do. Leave the deprecated analyzer
in and remove it with 4.0 when all old indexes cannot be read anymore?
{quote}
I do not think this is a backwards break, because IsoLatin1Filter is deprecated?
{noformat}
* @deprecated in favor of {...@link ASCIIFoldingFilter} which covers a
superset
* of Latin 1. This class will be removed in Lucene 3.0.
{noformat}
> Remove deprecated TokenStream API
> ---------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-1946
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1946
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: Analysis, contrib/analyzers
> Reporter: Uwe Schindler
> Assignee: Uwe Schindler
> Fix For: 3.0
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-1946.patch, LUCENE-1946.patch, LUCENE-1946.patch
>
>
> I looked into clover analysis: It seems to be no longer used since I removed
> the tests yesterday - I am happy!
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
