I think this was a mistake. Especially because the hint to the replacement method is the method itself.
----- Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael Busch [mailto:busch...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 6:42 PM > To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: svn commit: r824781 - in /lucene/java/trunk: ./ > contrib/memory/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/memory/ > contrib/memory/src/test/org/apache/lucene/index/memory/ > contrib/remote/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/ > contrib/surround/src/test/org/apache/luce > > On 10/13/09 7:28 AM, uschind...@apache.org wrote: > > @@ -115,7 +95,6 @@ > > *<p>Applications should usually call {...@link Searcher#search(Query)} > or > > * {...@link Searcher#search(Query,Filter)} instead. > > * @throws BooleanQuery.TooManyClauses > > - * @deprecated use {...@link #search(Weight, Filter, int)} instead. > > */ > > TopDocs search(Weight weight, Filter filter, int n) throws > IOException; > > > > Was this method just accidentally deprecated? > > Michael > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
