I think this was a mistake. Especially because the hint to the replacement
method is the method itself.

-----
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Busch [mailto:busch...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 6:42 PM
> To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: svn commit: r824781 - in /lucene/java/trunk: ./
> contrib/memory/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/memory/
> contrib/memory/src/test/org/apache/lucene/index/memory/
> contrib/remote/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/
> contrib/surround/src/test/org/apache/luce
> 
> On 10/13/09 7:28 AM, uschind...@apache.org wrote:
> > @@ -115,7 +95,6 @@
> >      *<p>Applications should usually call {...@link Searcher#search(Query)}
> or
> >      * {...@link Searcher#search(Query,Filter)} instead.
> >      * @throws BooleanQuery.TooManyClauses
> > -   * @deprecated use {...@link #search(Weight, Filter, int)} instead.
> >      */
> >     TopDocs search(Weight weight, Filter filter, int n) throws
> IOException;
> >
> 
> Was this method just accidentally deprecated?
> 
>   Michael
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to