Right. I was confused about that too.

 Michael

On 10/13/09 9:43 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
I think this was a mistake. Especially because the hint to the replacement
method is the method itself.

-----
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Busch [mailto:busch...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 6:42 PM
To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: svn commit: r824781 - in /lucene/java/trunk: ./
contrib/memory/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/memory/
contrib/memory/src/test/org/apache/lucene/index/memory/
contrib/remote/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/
contrib/surround/src/test/org/apache/luce

On 10/13/09 7:28 AM, uschind...@apache.org wrote:
@@ -115,7 +95,6 @@
      *<p>Applications should usually call {...@link Searcher#search(Query)}
or
      * {...@link Searcher#search(Query,Filter)} instead.
      * @throws BooleanQuery.TooManyClauses
-   * @deprecated use {...@link #search(Weight, Filter, int)} instead.
      */
     TopDocs search(Weight weight, Filter filter, int n) throws
IOException;
Was this method just accidentally deprecated?

   Michael

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to