Looks good. One thing: In Mark's artifacts, he changed the common-build.xml to not have -dev in the version before the release. You can see this in SVN. I am fine with having -dev in the source artefact, because if someone compiles his own bin from the artefact, it should have -dev in it, because it's not an official build.
Any comments about this?: I found something in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1973 that may need un-deprecation. Can you and Mark Miller also look into it? I find the method is very useful to prevent users from creating TopFieldDocCollector manually, what produced lots of confusion about the parameters of the static ctor (have to ask the weight for it..., hard to explain for someone, who only wants scores for sorted results). Uwe ----- Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael McCandless [mailto:luc...@mikemccandless.com] > Sent: Monday, October 26, 2009 5:18 PM > To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org > Cc: gene...@lucene.apache.org > Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 2.9.1 > > OK, I've built release artifacts from svn rev 829846 (on the 2.9 > branch), here: > > http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-area/lucene2.9.1/ > > Changes are here: > > http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-area/lucene2.9.1changes/ > > Please vote to officially release these artifacts as Apache Lucene > Java 2.9.1. > > Mike > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org