On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 12:47 PM, Yonik Seeley <yo...@lucidimagination.com> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 12:43 PM, Uwe Schindler <u...@thetaphi.de> wrote: >> Looks good. One thing: >> >> In Mark's artifacts, he changed the common-build.xml to not have -dev in the >> version before the release. You can see this in SVN. I am fine with having >> -dev in the source artefact, because if someone compiles his own bin from >> the artefact, it should have -dev in it, because it's not an official build. > > Right, having the "-dev" when someone tries to build it themselves is > the way we should keep it.
+1 So this means in general when doing the release, we leave the -dev in there? Ie, leaving the -dev doesn't affect the binary release (which gets its version, eg in the JAR's manifest, from the -Dversion=2.9.1 on the ant command line), I think? Mike --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
