How about opening an issue? This way someone else can come along and pick up the torch...
Mike On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 11:26 AM, Andrzej Bialecki <a...@getopt.org> wrote: > Andrzej Bialecki wrote: >> >> Michael McCandless wrote: >>> >>> +1 >>> >>> I guess we'd add a Fieldable.setOmitPositions? And then save that in >>> FieldInfos, and fix the postings writing/reading to respect it? Ie, >>> we can just change the index format. Encoding as negative numbers >> >> Yes, that's what I had in mind. I was a bit shy of bumping the format >> version, but likely there will be other changes that we can put under the >> same next version of the format. >> >>> isn't great because the termFreq is written as a vInt, which consumes >>> 5 bytes to encode any negative number. Wanna cough up a patch? >> >> Heh .. that's the right term for it, I haven't looked at the details of >> oal.index.* since 2.4-ish or so ... we'll see ;) > > Ehh, sorry - I think I'll give up for now, after looking at the combinatoric > increase in the number of arguments to various indexing classes ... > > -- > Best regards, > Andrzej Bialecki <>< > ___. ___ ___ ___ _ _ __________________________________ > [__ || __|__/|__||\/| Information Retrieval, Semantic Web > ___|||__|| \| || | Embedded Unix, System Integration > http://www.sigram.com Contact: info at sigram dot com > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
