On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 6:03 PM, Michael McCandless <[email protected]> wrote: > How about opening an issue? This way someone else can come along and > pick up the torch... +1 > > Mike > > On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 11:26 AM, Andrzej Bialecki <[email protected]> wrote: >> Andrzej Bialecki wrote: >>> >>> Michael McCandless wrote: >>>> >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> I guess we'd add a Fieldable.setOmitPositions? And then save that in >>>> FieldInfos, and fix the postings writing/reading to respect it? Ie, >>>> we can just change the index format. Encoding as negative numbers >>> >>> Yes, that's what I had in mind. I was a bit shy of bumping the format >>> version, but likely there will be other changes that we can put under the >>> same next version of the format. >>> >>>> isn't great because the termFreq is written as a vInt, which consumes >>>> 5 bytes to encode any negative number. Wanna cough up a patch? >>> >>> Heh .. that's the right term for it, I haven't looked at the details of >>> oal.index.* since 2.4-ish or so ... we'll see ;) >> >> Ehh, sorry - I think I'll give up for now, after looking at the combinatoric >> increase in the number of arguments to various indexing classes ... >> >> -- >> Best regards, >> Andrzej Bialecki <>< >> ___. ___ ___ ___ _ _ __________________________________ >> [__ || __|__/|__||\/| Information Retrieval, Semantic Web >> ___|||__|| \| || | Embedded Unix, System Integration >> http://www.sigram.com Contact: info at sigram dot com >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
