[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12780447#action_12780447
 ] 

Robert Muir edited comment on LUCENE-1606 at 11/20/09 5:31 AM:
---------------------------------------------------------------

bq. Does it make sense to implement here though?

I do not think so. I tested another solution where users wanted leading * 
wildcards on 100M+ term dictionary.
I found out what was acceptable (clarification: to these specific users/system) 
was for *  to actually match .{0,3} (between 0 and 3 of anything), and rewrote 
it to an equivalent regex like this.
This performed very well, because it can still avoid comparing many terms.

      was (Author: rcmuir):
    bq. Does it make sense to implement here though?

I do not think so. I tested another solution where users wanted leading * 
wildcards on 100M+ term dictionary.
I found out what was acceptable was for *  to actually match .{0,3} (between 0 
and 3 of anything), and rewrote it to an equivalent regex like this.
This performed very well, because it can still avoid comparing many terms.
  
> Automaton Query/Filter (scalable regex)
> ---------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-1606
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1606
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: contrib/*
>            Reporter: Robert Muir
>            Assignee: Robert Muir
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 3.1
>
>         Attachments: automaton.patch, automatonMultiQuery.patch, 
> automatonmultiqueryfuzzy.patch, automatonMultiQuerySmart.patch, 
> automatonWithWildCard.patch, automatonWithWildCard2.patch, LUCENE-1606.patch, 
> LUCENE-1606.patch
>
>
> Attached is a patch for an AutomatonQuery/Filter (name can change if its not 
> suitable).
> Whereas the out-of-box contrib RegexQuery is nice, I have some very large 
> indexes (100M+ unique tokens) where queries are quite slow, 2 minutes, etc. 
> Additionally all of the existing RegexQuery implementations in Lucene are 
> really slow if there is no constant prefix. This implementation does not 
> depend upon constant prefix, and runs the same query in 640ms.
> Some use cases I envision:
>  1. lexicography/etc on large text corpora
>  2. looking for things such as urls where the prefix is not constant (http:// 
> or ftp://)
> The Filter uses the BRICS package (http://www.brics.dk/automaton/) to convert 
> regular expressions into a DFA. Then, the filter "enumerates" terms in a 
> special way, by using the underlying state machine. Here is my short 
> description from the comments:
>      The algorithm here is pretty basic. Enumerate terms but instead of a 
> binary accept/reject do:
>       
>      1. Look at the portion that is OK (did not enter a reject state in the 
> DFA)
>      2. Generate the next possible String and seek to that.
> the Query simply wraps the filter with ConstantScoreQuery.
> I did not include the automaton.jar inside the patch but it can be downloaded 
> from http://www.brics.dk/automaton/ and is BSD-licensed.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to