Mike, I guess what I am implying is should i even bother with lucene-1606 and trunk?
or instead, should i be helping you, looking at TermsEnum, and working on integrating it into flex? On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 1:05 PM, Michael McCandless < luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 11:31 AM, Robert Muir <rcm...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> No, not really... just an optimization I found when hunting ;) > >> > >> I'm working now on an AutomatonTermsEnum that uses the flex API > >> directly, to test that performance. > >> > > > > I didn't mean to 'bail out' on this > > You didn't 'bail out'; I 'bailed in' ;) This is the joy of open > source... great big noisy Bazaar. > > > but I could not tell if TermsEnum was close to stabilized > > I think it's close; we need to do this port anyway, once automaton is > committed to trunk, so really I saved Mark some work ;) > > > and it might be significant work to convert it? > > It wasn't too bad, but maybe you can look it over once I post patch > and see if I messed anything up :) > > > Maybe benching numeric range would be easier and accomplish the same > thing? > > Yeah benching NRQ would be good too... many benchmarks still to run. > > Mike > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > -- Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com
