On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Robert Muir <[email protected]> wrote: > I guess here is where I just say that unicode and java are optimized for > utf-16 processing
I agree, though leaving things as UTF8 works fine for low level stuff (sorting, comparing equality, etc.)? > and so while I agree with byte[] being available in > places like this for flex indexing, > I'm already nervous about seeing code / optimizations that only work well > with latin-1, and are very slow / buggy for anything else. Buggy we should clearly outright fix. Slower, maybe. But very slow, I hope not? What places specifically are you worried about? Mike --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
