[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2034?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12781884#action_12781884
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2034:
-----------------------------------------
bq. i think you should make those non-final analyzers final, too.
+1
I think the analyzers should always be final. Maybe there are special cases but
for the most of them nobody should subclass.
Same amount of work to make your own anyway.
simon
> Massive Code Duplication in Contrib Analyzers - unifly the analyzer ctors
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-2034
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2034
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: contrib/analyzers
> Affects Versions: 2.9
> Reporter: Simon Willnauer
> Assignee: Robert Muir
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 3.1
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-2034,patch, LUCENE-2034,patch, LUCENE-2034.patch,
> LUCENE-2034.patch, LUCENE-2034.patch, LUCENE-2034.patch, LUCENE-2034.txt
>
>
> Due to the variouse tokenStream APIs we had in lucene analyzer subclasses
> need to implement at least one of the methodes returning a tokenStream. When
> you look at the code it appears to be almost identical if both are
> implemented in the same analyzer. Each analyzer defnes the same inner class
> (SavedStreams) which is unnecessary.
> In contrib almost every analyzer uses stopwords and each of them creates his
> own way of loading them or defines a large number of ctors to load stopwords
> from a file, set, arrays etc.. those ctors should be removed / deprecated and
> eventually removed.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
