[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2135?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12787624#action_12787624 ]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2135: -------------------------------------------- bq. all IndexReaders should call purge, mabe put it on toplevel IR.close default impl? Hmm... this actually gets tricky to get right, because of the FieldCacheKey. EG on closing a SegmentReader that's a clone of another, you don't want to evict it from the FieldCache. I guess I could fix each of the IndexReader subclasses to evict themselves from the cache. Let me look into that... > IndexReader.close should forcefully evict entries from FieldCache > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: LUCENE-2135 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2135 > Project: Lucene - Java > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Index > Reporter: Michael McCandless > Assignee: Michael McCandless > Fix For: 3.1 > > Attachments: LUCENE-2135.patch > > > Spinoff of java-user thread "heap memory issues when sorting by a string > field". > We rely on WeakHashMap to hold our FieldCache, keyed by reader. But this > lacks immediacy on releasing the reference, after a reader is closed. > WeakHashMap can't free the key until the reader is no longer referenced by > the app. And, apparently, WeakHashMap has a further impl detail that requires > invoking one of its methods for it to notice that a key has just become only > weakly reachable. > To fix this, I think on IR.close we should evict entries from the FieldCache, > as long as the sub-readers are truly closed (refCount dropped to 0). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org