[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2120?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12793775#action_12793775
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2120:
--------------------------------------------
I briefly diff'd the BR_DELETE_OPT branch in Zoie -- it looks like you switched
(via custom TermDocs/Positions) to enforcing deleted docs using an iterator
instead of double-check random-access, right? I had tried the same thing with
Lucene (a while back now), under LUCENE-1476/LUCENE-1536, and found that the
simple BitVector gave much better performance than an iterator (which then led
to applying filters random-access as well). Have you tested performance of
this switch? Maybe it works out to be faster, net/net, than doing the
double-deletions check?
> Possible file handle leak in near real-time reader
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-2120
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2120
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Index
> Affects Versions: 3.1
> Reporter: Michael McCandless
> Assignee: Michael McCandless
> Fix For: 3.1
>
>
> Spinoff of LUCENE-1526: Jake/John hit file descriptor exhaustion when testing
> NRT.
> I've tried to repro this, stress testing NRT, saturating reopens, indexing,
> searching, but haven't found any issue.
> Let's try to get to the bottom of it, here...
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
