I wanted to mention: I wanted to wait a little bit to have progress with the last transitions in solr to 3.0 (tokenstreams are almost finished), Version support, and some segment based problems. E.g. in 3.0, we had some methods accidentally removed with deprecations and so on. In my opinion, transition of solr is a good stress test of the 3.0 API. Because of that I wanted to wait a little bit for feedback about 3.0 from solr.
Mark, Robert: How far are we with progress in solr? Were there any additional problems with 3.0.0? Uwe ----- Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > -----Original Message----- > From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:u...@thetaphi.de] > Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 1:34 PM > To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org > Subject: RE: Lucene Java 2.9.2 > > My plan was to release it together with 3.0.1. Both version then will have > the same bug fix status. > > I have the scripts here to build the artifacts (as I added fast vector > highlighter poms), so I could do it for both and start the release. > > ----- > Uwe Schindler > H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen > http://www.thetaphi.de > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Michael McCandless [mailto:luc...@mikemccandless.com] > > Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 12:26 PM > > To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org > > Subject: Re: Lucene Java 2.9.2 > > > > Lucene 2.9.2 hasn't been released yet, but I think we should release > > it at some point soonish? It's accumulated some important bug fixes. > > > > Mike > > > > On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 10:59 PM, George Aroush <geo...@aroush.net> > wrote: > > > Hi Folks, > > > > > > Over at Lucene.Net, we have 2.9.1 ready for official release. This is > a > > > port of the current Lucene Java 2.9.1 release. > > > > > > When I raised the question about releasing Lucene.Net 2.9.1, a > question > > was > > > asked to port over LUCENE-2190 for which a patch was quickly made > (see: > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-331). This begs the > > > question, if Lucene.Net takes just this one patch, than Lucene.Net > 2.9.1 > > is > > > now 2.9.1.1 (which I personally don't like to see happening as I > prefer > > to > > > see a 1-to-1 release match). > > > > > > So, I examined the list of fixes made in 2.9.2 here: > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE/fixforversion/12314342 > and > > > found that this is a small task to port over. > > > > > > So far so good? Good. > > > > > > Now, as far as I know, Lucene Java never made an official 2.9.2 > release, > > or > > > is this in the works (I don't recall seeing any email about it)? If > so, > > > what's the time line? I think our decision on the Lucene.Net side > will > > be > > > based on the answer to this question. > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > -- George > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
