https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1657

i just struckthrough the things that are done.

> Mark, Robert: How far are we with progress in solr? Were there any
> additional problems with 3.0.0?
>
> Uwe
>
> -----
> Uwe Schindler
> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
> http://www.thetaphi.de
> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:u...@thetaphi.de]
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 1:34 PM
>> To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
>> Subject: RE: Lucene Java 2.9.2
>>
>> My plan was to release it together with 3.0.1. Both version then will have
>> the same bug fix status.
>>
>> I have the scripts here to build the artifacts (as I added fast vector
>> highlighter poms), so I could do it for both and start the release.
>>
>> -----
>> Uwe Schindler
>> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
>> http://www.thetaphi.de
>> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
>>
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Michael McCandless [mailto:luc...@mikemccandless.com]
>> > Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 12:26 PM
>> > To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
>> > Subject: Re: Lucene Java 2.9.2
>> >
>> > Lucene 2.9.2 hasn't been released yet, but I think we should release
>> > it at some point soonish?  It's accumulated some important bug fixes.
>> >
>> > Mike
>> >
>> > On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 10:59 PM, George Aroush <geo...@aroush.net>
>> wrote:
>> > > Hi Folks,
>> > >
>> > > Over at Lucene.Net, we have 2.9.1 ready for official release.  This is
>> a
>> > > port of the current Lucene Java 2.9.1 release.
>> > >
>> > > When I raised the question about releasing Lucene.Net 2.9.1, a
>> question
>> > was
>> > > asked to port over LUCENE-2190 for which a patch was quickly made
>> (see:
>> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-331).  This begs the
>> > > question, if Lucene.Net takes just this one patch, than Lucene.Net
>> 2.9.1
>> > is
>> > > now 2.9.1.1 (which I personally don't like to see happening as I
>> prefer
>> > to
>> > > see a 1-to-1 release match).
>> > >
>> > > So, I examined the list of fixes made in 2.9.2 here:
>> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE/fixforversion/12314342
>> and
>> > > found that this is a small task to port over.
>> > >
>> > > So far so good?  Good.
>> > >
>> > > Now, as far as I know, Lucene Java never made an official 2.9.2
>> release,
>> > or
>> > > is this in the works (I don't recall seeing any email about it)?  If
>> so,
>> > > what's the time line?  I think our decision on the Lucene.Net side
>> will
>> > be
>> > > based on the answer to this question.
>> > >
>> > > Thanks.
>> > >
>> > > -- George
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>> > > For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
>



-- 
Robert Muir
rcm...@gmail.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to