[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2207?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12801312#action_12801312
]
Koji Sekiguchi edited comment on LUCENE-2207 at 1/17/10 4:54 AM:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hi Robert, thank you for looking this so quickly!
{quote}
ok i found the bug. the problem is incrementToken() unconditionally increments
the offset before it starts its main loop:
line 165:
offset++;
{quote}
Indeed.
In attached patch, I added one more offset-- line and two more testcases. All
tests pass and this patch fixes the original problem that was found in Solr
with FastVectorHighlighter.
was (Author: koji):
Hi Robert, thank you for looking this so quickly!
{quote}
ok i found the bug. the problem is incrementToken() unconditionally increments
the offset before it starts its main loop:
line 165:
offset++;
{quote}
Indeed.
In attached patch, I added one more offset-- line and two more testcases. All
tests pass.
> CJKTokenizer generates tokens with incorrect offsets
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-2207
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2207
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: contrib/analyzers
> Reporter: Koji Sekiguchi
> Attachments: LUCENE-2207.patch, LUCENE-2207.patch, LUCENE-2207.patch,
> LUCENE-2207.patch, TestCJKOffset.java
>
>
> If I index a Japanese *multi-valued* document with CJKTokenizer and highlight
> a term with FastVectorHighlighter, the output snippets have incorrect
> highlighted string. I'll attach a program that reproduces the problem soon.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
