[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2339?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Earwin Burrfoot updated LUCENE-2339:
------------------------------------
Attachment: LUCENE-2339.patch
1 -> I googled all around and nobody mentions any problems save for those with
old 1.4 JDK. If problems arise, we can conditionalize code inside - making this
optimization NIOFSDir-exclusive is just plain sad, what about MMapDir?
2 -> Don't have strong feelings there, but Uwe insists everything should be
consistent and if I use Collection for sync(), then I should use it everywhere.
Makes sense probably.
3 -> I feel that static imports are great. They take clutter away, but that's
just my opinion. Can change this.
4 -> Applied this, without shady "optimizations".
5 -> ok
6 -> Did that on purporse. Directory.copy(src, dest, true) is way less readable
than src.copyTo(dest); src.close(). There's no freaking way to tell what that
true means without reading docs.
7 -> I really, really, really, really hate libraries that print something I
didn't ask them for. Besides, current implementation prints nothing on similar
occasion, so I'm following the trend.
> Allow Directory.copy() to accept a collection of file names to be copied
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-2339
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2339
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Earwin Burrfoot
> Assignee: Michael McCandless
> Attachments: LUCENE-2339.patch, LUCENE-2339.patch, LUCENE-2339.patch
>
>
> Par example, I want to copy files pertaining to a certain commit, and not
> everything there is in a Directory.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
