[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2354?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12851010#action_12851010
 ] 

Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2354:
---------------------------------------

bq. But the encoding is unchanged right? (Ie only using 7 bits per byte, same 
as trunk).

Yes. And i think we should keep it for now using 7 bit. Problems start when the 
sort order of terms is needed (which is the case for NRQ). As default in flex 
is the UTF-8 term comparator, it would not sort correctly for numeric fields 
with full 8 bits?

bq. And you cutover to BytesRef TermsEnum API too - great. Presumably search 
perf would improve but only a tiny bit since NRQ visits so few terms?

I dont think you will notice a difference. A standard int range contains maybe 
10 to 20 sub-ranges (at maximum), so converting between string and TermRef 
should not count. But the new implementation is more clean. In principle we 
could remove the whole char[]/String based API in NumericUtils - I only have to 
rewrite the tests and remove the NumericUtils test in backwards (as no longer 
applies then, too).

> Convert NumericUtils and NumericTokenStream to use BytesRef instead of 
> Strings/char[]
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-2354
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2354
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: Flex Branch
>            Reporter: Uwe Schindler
>            Assignee: Uwe Schindler
>             Fix For: Flex Branch
>
>         Attachments: LUCENE-2354.patch
>
>
> After LUCENE-2302, we should use TermToBytesRefAttribute to index using 
> NumericTokenStream. This also should convert the whole NumericUtils to use 
> BytesRef when converting numerics.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to