Re: [FYI] Java violates US patent?

[Matt Welsh]

Ernst de Haan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Found a link to this article on JavaLobby:
> 
>   http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/pulpit19981203.html
> 
> Could turn out bad. Very bad.

Unless it turns out that the patent is ill-founded because Java
represents "prior art" in terms of the technology that the patent
is claiming.

mdw