On 24 Mar 1999, Albert Y.C. Lai wrote:
stuff. Yet, if I get it right, that the linux port requires such
beasts as libstdc++-libc6.0-1.so.2 means it is linked against cutting
Well, libstdc++-libc6.0-1.so.2 isn't a "real" library, I don't
believe. Simply symlinking libstdc++.so to the "beast" should solve
the problem. And, I'm using a "cutting-edge" version of libstdc++
(egcs-1.1.1) anyway, and it seems to be no problem. If your
aversion is to C++ (and its shared libs), then I, too, am wordless.
My system is fairly vanilla Intel RH-5.2 with egcs-1.1.1 for
libstdc++. What seems to be not working for you?
--troy
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
