Anand Palaniswamy wrote:
>
> > Date: Sun, 27 Jun 1999 21:17:37 -0700
> > From: Nathan Meyers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > > > How many of their patches have gone back into the Java tree?
> > >
> > > Many of them are going into 1.3.
> >
> > People are talking about 1.3? Not 1.2.3?
>
> Yes, 1.3.
Thanks for the update...
> > Does this imply another massive set of changes to the Java platform?
>
> Nope. Minor upgrade. The purple dot marked 4Q01 might be like 1.2.
> For now the emphasis is stability, reliability and performance. I am
> beginning to sound like our marketing dept, but from the engineering
> trenches it does look like that is what we are doing.
>From the outside trenches, "stability" is a good word to be hearing. It
just seems a break with tradition to be incrementing the .1's release
digit without major upheaval.
Nathan
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
