Ok. Are the numbers in seconds or is a higher number better?
/Jesper
Patrick LAM wrote:
> I ran a few benchmarks to compare the different JVM's out there, on the
> SPEC benchmarks plus two of our internal benchmarks, sablecc (a parser
> generator), and soot, a frozen version of our analysis framework.
>
> Here are the results. These results are not scientific; in particular, I
> only ran each benchmark once; usually we will run them five times. So
> they should only be considered as an approximate measurement of the
> performance of the various VM's.
>
> Blackdown Sun Blackdown+javacomp
> compress 66.01 70.45 70.75
> db 146.54 112.34 153.66
> jack 62.57 39.05 48.58
> javac 71.08 46.71 58.39
> jess 48.13 33.00 36.95
> mpegaudio 57.95 59.27 58.59
> mtrt 37.97 31.93 24.11
> raytrace 51.61 30.99 32.49
> sablecc-w 41.92 32.16 39.11
> soot-j 132.19 92.76 107.88
>
> Blackdown denotes Blackdown JDK1.2.2RC3.
> Sun denotes Sun/Inprise JDK1.2.2RC1.
> Blackdown+javacomp is Blackdown RC3, but using the javacomp JIT provided
> with the Sun JDK.
>
> Tests were run on a dual-processor PII/400 running kernel 2.2.8.
>
> pat
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
| Jesper Nordenberg, M.Sc. in C.S.E. NNL Technology AB
| E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Teknikringen 1A
| Phone: +46 13 211400 S-583 30 Linköping
| Internet: www.nnl.se, wap.nnl.se SWEDEN
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
