On Thu, 9 Dec 1999, Mark Christiaens wrote:
> I'm not familiar with this benchmark. What is better? Higher or lower
> values? Can these benchmarks also be run on a 1.1 JVM? I'm especially
> interested in the IBM machine which is 1.1.8.
We have results from IBM's 1.1.8 somewhere around here, and they are
generally fast; I don't remember the specific numbers. The times reported
were execution times, so smaller is better.
I'll set up a timing run (to get more precise numbers) and include IBM's
numbers at some point.
pat
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
