Fair point.  But if I were to be cynical, perish the thought, maybe Chris 
would prefer users not to go with JBuilder as it may hurt Netbean's 
popularity.

As NetBeans was a asset acquisition, does Sun still give NetBeans money to 
keep it up to date?

Nicholas
 
> Resent-Date: Fri, 10 Dec 1999 08:14:07 -0700 (MST)
> From: Michael Thome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Date: Fri, 10 Dec 1999 10:13:55 -0500 (EST)
> To: Chris LeDantec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: another possibility wrt the press-release.
> Resent-Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> X-Mailing-List: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> archive/latest/1974
> X-Loop: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Resent-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> >>>>> "Chris" == Chris LeDantec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > ...
> > inprise makes tools. they also partner with sun who just picked up two 
tools
> > companies and has bcm a competitor. this is an interesting scenario 
since
> > the owner of java technology is now a direct competitor with companies 
that
> > are close partners.  it would make sense, with a simple omission of 
fact in
> > an initial press-release, to create an air of suspicion around sun -- 
being
> > the bigger, more visible company they would of course take most of the 
heat
> > (not withstanding previously rocky relationships with developers and 
the
> > luke-warm reception of scsl).  inprise then, is in perfect position to 
speak
> > out to a grass-roots user base and say 'we worked on the port, but the 
way
> > sun handled the release was a travesty of community development' then 
after
> > some time passes: 'use our tool instead and show big company what's 
what.'
> 
> "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by
> stupidity."  (Hanlon's Razor?)
> 
> PR folks working for large organizations typically don't have two
> clues to rub together - not only about techical details and
> development politics, but also about what is really important.  I
> wouldn't be surprised if Sun's and Inprise's PR people genuinely
> thought that the Blackdown group consisted entirely of Sun employees
> and paid ghostwriters.  
> 
> -mik 
> 
> -- 
> Michael Thome ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


----------------------------------------------------------------------
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to